T5 will have shops, cafes and bars like any other airport, and some of those are already fitted out – Harrods to name one.The terminal also has some new features, particularly in the area of security.
HEATHROW TERMINAL FIVE SECURITY
Every passenger will have their photograph taken and fingerprint scanned at passport control. Their fingerprint will be checked again at the gate before boarding.
“It’s so we can make sure that the person who turns up at the gate is the same one who checked in,” Mr Pearman says.
Another state-of-the-art addition involves X-ray scanners which screen hand luggage before they enter departures.
Never used before, the Advanced Threat Identification system is designed to detect explosives and liquids in baggage and automatically divert suspicious bags to one side for further examination.
In fact, the entire building is designed with security in mind: “We’ve been able to work security in, rather than try to add it on afterwards,” Mr Pearman says.
This is of course, a total lie.
This nauseating piece of propaganda from BBQ by the completely ignorant ‘Victoria Bone’ is astonishing in its breathless promoting of Terminal five in nothing but glowing terms.
She completely leaves out any negative consequences to the fingerprinting of
criminals passengers, and this is in the light of the huge fight against biometric ID cards that is going on in this country. Such an omission can only be by design, and that therefore means this article is pure propaganda and part of a ‘softening up’ exercise for the British population, who, if they were told about what this really means to them, might refuse to fly out of Terminal 5 altogether.
Richard Rogers has made one of the worst buildings in the history of mankind. His firm is going to be responsible (unless the building is retrofitted and fixed to work correctly) for a violation of humans on a scale bigger than the concentration camps of Germany; Up to 30m passengers will travel through Terminal 5 every year.
Millions of people are going to be processed through this infernal machine, by his design, humiliating, violating and dehumanizing them for no other reason than that it was possible to do.
History will judge this building and its designer after the biometric fad and ‘security’ (Security Theatre) hysteria are over over.
They will say that what Richard Rogers has done with this Terminal 5 was pure evil, architecture in the service of Fascism and it will cast a dark shadow over any other building or success he ever had.
I for one, I will never travel through this building. I will not submit to this Fascism and inhuman architectural experimentation.
SHAME SHAME SHAME once again on BBQ for this blatant piece of propaganda.
SHAME on Richard Rogers, who has designed this Fascist monstrosity.
I pray that the truth about this building gets out and that people refuse to mover through it.
And for you people who do not know anything about identity and security, a quick recap.
There is absolutely no reason to take people’s fingerprints and photographs as they check in.
First of all, this is being done not only for international flights, but for ALL FLIGHTS including domestic ones. That means that if you, a British Citizen, want to fly to Manchester you have to be fingerprinted.
Inside your own country!
That is INSANE.
The reason why they are doing this is that travelers on international flights and domestic flights are mixed in one large unsegregated departure lounge, unlike any other airport in the world, where passengers flying on domestic and international flights are normally separated by walls. If someone got on a flight that connects through terminal five, it could be possible for them to get onto a domestic flight and then evade immigration control since the passenger area is mixed. To fix this problem with the building, they are fingerprinting EVERYONE so that this loophole is closed.
This has to be the stupidest mistake ever in the history of architecture.
The article above does not mention this of course, since it is propaganda.
Secondly, when you check into an international flight in a properly designed airport, you go to the international departure lounge and show your passport, which has your photo in it. The staff check your face against the picture in your passport. The name in your passport is checked against your name in your ticket. You are let through.
When you get to the gate, you show your passport again and your ticket stub, and the staff check your face against the photo in your passport, and the name on the stub. You are let onto the flight.
Fingerprinting you is nothing more than Security Theatre; this extra step adds no extra security to the normal process of checking in, and similarly, taking another photo of you in addition to the one you have in your passport adds no extra security whatsoever.
This is total Security Theatre, insanity and vendor driven garbage.
And there you have it.
By all means, tell everyone you know about this outrageous and vile building.