We previously addressed the ‘encouragement’ of HPV vaccination for minors, particularly girls, with the vaccine Gardasil.
For summary, we may conclude;
1. Gardasil has not been proven to directly cause any deaths.
2. Gardasil appears to have been contrived to open a new market rather than address a pressing healthcare issue.
3. The efficacy of Gardasil (how long protection lasts and how good that protection is) is questionable and still undetermined. Available estimates indicate 3-5 year protection from 3 doses.
4. Fear-mongering works both ways.
5. While it may be hard to see the truth, it must be looked for. Merck, GlaxoSmithkline and your goverments (US and UK at least) wish you to submit your daughters (and possibly sons) to yet another injection or their say-so. Are you sure you have no questions?
Today the vaccination of Scottish girls begins, and with it a lesson in how to manipulate a population for profit, and with no regard for their health. This will be addressed shortly.
There were several comments to the initial Gardasil post, some of which were via email and were not published at the time, and which now follow below, for completeness:
PLEASE (RE-)READ THE PUBLISHED COMMENTS FIRST.
May I burn down that straw man?
Aspirin is safe; that is the difference between it and Guadakill. Aspirin was initially prepared from the bark of trees. It is a naturally occurring medicine, unlike Guardakill which is a man made poison.
There is *no straw man here*. Aspirin and STW are used, in my context, to denounce your point on alum, i.e. that just because you don’t understand how something works doesn’t mean it must be distrusted. One could apply this to all homeopathy, I just picked SJW at random. According to ‘the science’ SJW is no more effective than a placebo. http://nccam.nih.gov/health/stjohnswort/#science And that from the National Centre for Complementary and Alternative Medicine.
St Johns Wort is also a naturally occurring plant, and is therefore much safer and preferable as a medicine. It also has a long history of safe use.
Now, HERE is a straw man. I would guess there are many more deaths from digitalis than Gardasil will ever manage, despite also being a plant with a long history of safe use. Aspirin kills 500 people in the US per year, apparently. Just a stat, and probably through misuse, but its still a killer. One can twist anything… omigoditsachemical! …. its all about context. Alum has been used for /just/ 60 years and has recently been ‘proven’ safe on paper, when anyone who has used it has known it is safe in vivo. And yes, I’ve used it and taken it. http://www.drugresearcher.com/news/ng.asp?id=49797-alum-given-clean Together we could say “Who do you trust?”. Or, “Why trust one drug and not the other?”, as someone clever once said. Now we both know the answers to /those/ questions.
Mankind is much better off living inside and with his environment. Guardakill is an unnatural medicine; the need for it is artificial, the lust behind its making is the lust for money, and while the medicine itself is not evil, the people who make it most certainly are.
I would agree with this. What I wouldn’t agree with is throwing petrol and matches on non-existant straw men. There should be enough real, substantive data and well-argued opinion (and there is) to let people come to their own conclusion… that only a fool would inject their child with ‘GovDrugX’.
Guardasil has killed people. That is a fact.
No it’s not! You can show people the reality, but you can’t make up ‘the truth’. Those FDA reports should put enough doubt in anyones mind about Gardasil, but there is no “Gardasil Kills – Fact”. If one starts sounding like the Daily Mail, credibility flies out of the window.
The rules of peer review do not extend into the coroners office, and those recorded deaths and the numbers of people damaged are *not* opinion. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System is not going to falsely attribute death to a vaccine (I would imagine) which is where those numbers come from.
Wrong again! I read all the FDA/VAERS reports last night and not a single one attributes death to Gardasil.
They merely report adverse effects in anything from minutes to weeks following Gardasil vaccination. Many of the patients had other injections at the same time. Many had so long between jab and death that mentioning Gardasil seems nothing more than thoroughness.
You KNOW what [we] think of these ‘medicines’, and you know what [we] will do for our daughters. If drugs like Gardasil and chickenpox vaccine are to exposed for the fraudulent, greed-soaked tripe that they are then it must be done through strong, coherent argument and not by setting flame to reality.
Response 6/7 combined:
Guardasil has killed people. That is a fact.
No it’s not! You can show people the reality, but you can’t make up ‘the
truth’. Those FDA reports should put enough doubt in anyones mind about
Gardasil, but there is no “Gardasil Kills – Fact”. If one starts
sounding like the Daily Mail, credibility flies out of the window.
So you are telling me that the report that attributes the deaths of
those girls to Gardasil is false, yes?
JudicialWatch’s conclusion that G-causes-D is OPINION based on a misinterpretation of official documents. The reports never link G and D. They are simple, clear reports which state known facts about each case.
then what you are saying is that Judicial Watch are libeling Merc. Both
things cannot be true at the same time.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/6428.shtml says unambiguously that the
deaths are related to Gardasil. Are you saying that they are lying?
Not lying per se, but distorting beyond reasonable limits. As I said previously, this does no good and leaves them looking like rabid haters without the ability to construct a strong enough argument from the available information, without resorting to screeching FEAR! EVIL! DEATH!
??? so the above is a forgery? Help me out here!
That is a VAERS report listing Gardasil as the cause of death!
NO!!! Read that pdf!
1st page: ‘Gardasil did not cause the patients death’
P.2 ‘Cause of death was sudden death’. Other factors involved. Does not blame Gardasil.
P.3 All just hearsay! A nurse who heard from a nurse… and anaphylaxis DOES NOT occur 3 days after exposure. It’s a bit quicker than that. Ask anyone with a peanut/bee sting allergy. Does not blame Gardasil.
P.4 Hearsay! Bloodclot 2 weeks after vacc. Could have been any cause!Does not blame Gardasil.
P.5 Death 2 weeks after vacc. No direct link at all. Does not blame Gardasil.
P.6 Another 2 week gap Does not blame Gardasil.
P.7 States ‘manner of death natural’!!!! Does not blame Gardasil.
P.8 History of heart problems, died of heart problem. Does not blame Gardasil.
P.9 Viral sepsis and secondary infection. Symptoms started BEFORE last vaccine. Does not blame Gardasil.
P.10 Hearsay, no cause of death reported. Does not blame Gardasil.
Are you now seeing the difference between the official VAERS reports and the conlusions/opinions in the JudWac piece?
then they would NEVER list Gardasil as the cause of death if they were
not absolutely sure would they not?
See above Gardasil is NEVER listed as cause of death by VAERS.
Why trust one source and not another?
Just because JudWac appear to agree with our stance on BigPharma does not mean they are virtuous truth-givers. They have their agenda, just as Merck does.
We at Blogdial should know better though, and decide for ourselves.
Now, who are you going to believe, me or your own eyes? ((C) Groucho)
What have I missed here?
The blindingly obvious! That Mercks clinical trial, and JudWac’s take on the VAERS reports are all spin to support a position, and somewhere under it all, crushed and splintered, lies the reality.
I’m not sure what the reality is; VARERS says ‘death by Gardasil’ you
say no such reports even exist.
VAERS NEVER EVER says death by Gardasil. See above. See the BMJ article on safety.
The ambiguity, the complexity, everything about it screams out to me
that it must be totally shunned. An impenetrable reality is as bad as a
lie, and in the face of that, taking the risk is just not an option.
But we can find the reality, when we remember to treat JudWac with the same basic scepticism that we treat Merck. I would like to believe JudWac, but they give me no reason to do so when I look at the reality behind what they are saying.
Then add into the mix that Justice Watch had to sue for the information,
the case is closed; these guys are evil and their medicine is no good!
And JudWac are misguided, severely biased, narrow-minded, blinkered scaremongers whose stance does not stand up to the most preliminary of scrutinies. But we have found this out, and we can understand the reality. We can take each for what it is and still know that Merck is evil, and that JudWac is at least trying to stand on the right side.
Because… as someone clever once said… We Are The Best.